Moving – Living Trust – Retitling Assets?

Michigan:
I’m thinking about selling my home Lease to Own. I’m worried about insurance liability and tax consequences as well as my current mortgage company calling my loan “due on sale” because I’m no longer the owner occupant.
Can I keep this home as my perminent address when I move out of state? I’ll pay state tax in MI but TX has none. My wife co/owner would change her address to the new Texas location.
What about a living trust? Would this protect me from liability?
Will my current mortage company allow me to re-title the property to a living trust?
Thanks

Posted under Appartment

This post was written by admin on September 1, 2009

Tags: , , , ,

I Am Not Going To Work Anymore Overtime!?

AP
Housing aid bill faces veto by President Bush
Friday May 9, 4:01 am ET
House passes massive homeowner rescue plan, defying President Bush’s veto threat
WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrats’ plans to help hundreds of thousands of homeowners struggling with rising subprime mortgage rates and plummeting house values could be sidetracked by President Bush’s threatened veto and the backing of many congressional Republicans.
ADVERTISEMENT
Opponents of the plan say more prudent homebuyers and renters shouldn’t be called upon to bail out borrowers who gambled on ever-rising housing prices and lost.
“The American people don’t want to make their neighbor’s payment when they’re having trouble making their own,” said Rep. Randy Neugebauer, R-Texas.
The Democratic-controlled House on Thursday passed a homeowner rescue plan that would provide cheaper, government-backed mortgages to half a million debt-ridden borrowers and bolster an economy crippled by the housing crisis. The House approved the measure by a vote of 266-154, with 39 Republicans — mostly from areas suffering worst from housing woes — supporting it.
Defying veto threats, the House voted to let the Federal Housing Administration take on up to $300 billion in new mortgages so that financially strapped borrowers facing foreclosure could refinance.
The plan by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., is the centerpiece of a broader package of bills approved Thursday that Democrats say will prevent more foreclosures and help homeowners and communities deal with the fallout from the mortgage crisis.
The measure is targeted at homeowners facing default, including many who owe more than their houses are worth.
For instance, a homeowner who owes $290,000 on a house now worth $225,000 could refinance into an FHA-backed loan if the mortgage holder was willing to take a loss of about 36 percent. The borrower’s monthly mortgage payments would fall from $2,200 to about $1,200.
Loan holders would have an incentive to participate, proponents believe, since the alternative would be costly foreclosures, which can involve losses of 50 percent or more.
Supporters hope the package — which awaits action in the Senate — will serve as the basis for a broad bipartisan housing compromise that could satisfy both parties’ keen appetite for delivering election-year aid to anxious constituents.
But Bush’s veto warnings, backed by staunch GOP opposition, are clouding its prospects.
“House Democrats passed bills that they know will never become law. Most Americans understand that we shouldn’t create a taxpayer-funded bailout for lenders and speculators,” said Tony Fratto, a White House spokesman.
Under Frank’s plan, homeowners currently considered too risky to qualify could refinance into FHA-backed loans if their lenders agreed to take substantial losses on the original mortgages. Borrowers would have to show they could afford to make payments on the new loans. They would have to share with FHA at least half of their proceeds if they profited from selling or refinancing again.
The plan is projected to cost $2.7 billion over the next five years.
The House on Thursday also passed, 239-188, a bill to send $15 billion to states to buy and fix up foreclosed property. Bush has threatened to veto that measure also, contending it rewards the very lenders who helped caused the housing chaos and could act as an incentive for them to foreclose rather than find ways to help struggling borrowers stay in their homes.
The bills are H.R. 5818 and H.R. H830

Posted under Appartment

This post was written by admin on September 1, 2009

Tags: , , ,

Puppy Seller Won’t Accept My Check Payments. She Wants Puppy Back. What Can I Do?

I bought a puppy from a breeder for total of $1200. I was to pay $150.00 upfront which was in May and we exchanged the $150.00 for the puppy in my state of Texas (we met). The additional amount is to be paid in full by Feb 12 2009. The seller agreed to do this for 2 reasons. 1. I did not have the money at the time due to my mothers funeral expense. 2. She had no buyers for the puppy and wanted to sell it b4 it got too big. The night b4 we met she told me someone called her and wanted the pup, but she would still go through with our agreement. She did, but when I voiced concerns to her about the puppies health she started hinting at wanting the puppy back and for us to drive it back to her in Lousiana. I refused and took care of the puppies problems and told her the pup was not a disposable piece of property , but our family member now. I have sent her payments and she won’t cash checks. If payments isn’t received by 2/2009 she doesn’t have to send me the AKC papers and she wants pup.

Posted under Appartment

This post was written by admin on September 1, 2009

Tags: , , , , , , , ,